7 decades of the dark side of history.

I completely agree—Successful people build companies that change the way we live and work. More successful people go even further, shaping entire nations that affect the lives of millions. But most successful people create religions—that influence not just a generation, but entire civilizations for centuries. 

Today, I am fortunate enough to be able to share  Panglong Agreement it's been seven decades ago.

Signed on February 12, 1947, this agreement was meant to bring people together—uniting Myanmar’s ethnic groups and paving the way for independence. But even today, it sparks debates about what went wrong and what could still be made right.

Back in the colonial days, Myanmar (then Burma) was split into two areas: Burma Proper, where the Burman majority lived, and the Frontier Areas, home to ethnic groups like the Shan, Kachin, and Chin. These regions were ruled differently, which caused a big gap between the communities.

General Aung San, a key figure in the independence movement, knew that for Myanmar to be free, all these groups had to work together. That’s why he invited leaders from the ethnic minorities to a meeting in a small town called Panglong in Shan State.

The agreement was simple but ambitious. Here’s what was promised:

1. Equality: Everyone, regardless of ethnicity, would be treated as equals in the new Union of Burma.
2. Autonomy: Ethnic groups in the Frontier Areas could govern themselves to some extent.
3. Development: The government would help improve the infrastructure and living standards in minority areas.
4. Voluntary Unity: Ethnic groups wouldn’t be forced into the Union; they would join willingly.

Despite its noble intentions, its promises have not always been honored. Many ethnic groups feel that the federal principles of autonomy and equality outlined in the agreement have been sidelined over the decades. This led to long-lasting civil conflicts, with ethnic groups demanding the rights and recognition they felt they were owed.

Even today, the Panglong Agreement is a big deal. People often refer back to it when discussing how to bring peace to Myanmar. The federalism is a system of government —where different regions have more control over their own affairs—was at the heart of Panglong, and it’s still being talked about as a solution.

Efforts like the 21st Century Panglong Conference, launched under Aung San Suu Kyi, tried to revisit the spirit of the agreement. While progress has been slow, the fact that leaders are still talking about it shows how much it matters.

The Panglong Agreement is more than just a historical event—it’s a lesson. It reminds us that:

• Inclusivity is key: Everyone deserves a seat at the table.
• Promises must be kept: Words alone can’t build trust; actions matter more.
• Unity requires effort: Respecting differences is what makes true unity possible.

I am grateful for all the educational opportunities it has afforded us over the years. I know delivering on those goals will produce the best economic outcomes for all Myanmar people.